Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Torture
Herald-Mail Forums > Politics > World Politics
Pages: 1, 2
WVU-Mountaineers
I'm not saying that I agree with it, but do they not think that other Western countries are doing the same thing that we are? Why do they also always target the US as opposed to Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Cuba, etc...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4743485.stm
Mcgee
If it saves 0ne american life over there or anywere else.

RED is positave & Black is Negative
I`m tired of hearing from all these people who think a little questioning is all it takes to get an answer from these people. It takes more than questioning from these kind of people. JMT.
Mcgee
I know we haven`t heard the worst reports of how we are treated when caught by those people. He got much less than what would have happen if a US solder had been in there hands. I have no simpathy for a Major no less. Who gave arms to the people who want to kill us. ( RED is Positave & Black is Neg).
Idiot
QUOTE (Mcgee @ Aug 7 2005, 10:04 AM)
( RED is Positave & Black is Neg).

It's time to move on to Ohm's Law.

See if you can work with three variables.
Udmas
I would say Bush should veto this bill. The reason is, just exactly what does cruel, inhuman or degrading mean. By who's definition al-Qaeda's, Spain's or maybe the ACLU's.

But then again I'm sure if we would just ask the terrorists nicely they would tell us everything we want to know.
SMan
This Tuesday's episode of Frontline on PBS:

QUOTE
The Torture Question
The Bush administration's internal power struggle to create a legal framework to aggressively interrogate enemy fighters in the war on terror.


10/18 at 9 p.m., if you're interested. I enjoy Frontline. They toe the middle fairly well.
Udmas
That's the reason so much of this junk legisaltion gets passed. All the senators have to do is attach the junk amendment to an important bill and they know it will get passed.

This is just another feel good look good do nothing amendment.

So as I said he should veto it on principle, plus you could add it to one of your lists of reasons you hate Bush. wink.gif
BMIC
BTW, Frontline is well known to be a blatantly liberal propagandizer. They're a bit more high brow than most liberal mouthpieces, but they're far from balanced and objective. They're really just classic PBS = FLAMING liberal.
SMan
The only Frontline episode I've ever had a problem with was the one that was all about President Bush and his religious faith. I believe it was called "The Jesus Factor" or something similar. I couldn't believe how over the top belittling that was to the President and the religious conservatives that support him.

I guess with Frontline, like anything else, your point of view depends on where you're viewing it from. Maybe it seems like a reasonable program to me because I go into it with the idea that it's going to be typical PBS liberalism, but it's usually not that bad.
tattoomeb
Sadistic behavior caught on tape in Afghanistan

If true, this is more disgusting than some of the Abu Ghraib stuff that has come out.
SMan
Please tell me how burning dead bodies is torture. Maybe this is disrespectful but how is it torturing a dead body?????

BTW, torture is tattoomeb's description. The word "torture" never appears in that article.
Udmas
I would agree it's more disgusting, if it's true. So I think the real question here is where is the line, I mean we can't just ask them nicely that's not going to work but we have to use some method of interrogation or were not going to get any information.
SMan
Hold up. What article are you guys looking at? tatoo's link takes me to a story of US soldiers burning the dead bodies of Taliban fighters and broadcasting taunts to a nearby village that harbours Taliban. Are you guys looking at something different?
Udmas
Same article I just missed Tat's line about it being torture
Udmas
The Geneva Conventions, we should follow them even if the terrorists won't. Now I'm not going to defend all torture but what did this amendment accomplish? I say it will accomplish nothing.

90 senators becoming outraged about this I doubt that, maybe 90 senators hoping for reelection.

Just had to get in that crack about Bush didn't you biggrin.gif
SMan
QUOTE (Idiot @ Oct 19 2005, 06:14 PM)
Whether or not it's torture, it certainly is sadistic and not something we should be proud that US soldiers are doing. It also defeats the argument I've read most often here, which is anything goes if it means we get the info we need to keep us safe. How does burning a dead body get you more info?

*



I don't think the intention was to get information in this case. I believe it was to outrage the hiding Taliban to the point of coming out to fight. Or would you rather they enter the village and risk innocents?
Idiot
QUOTE (Udmas @ Oct 19 2005, 05:34 PM)
90 senators becoming outraged about this I doubt that, maybe 90 senators hoping for reelection.

*

Good point, but I'll take whatever I can get.

No matter what some people may think, I do always look for the best in people. smile.gif

wink.gif
Udmas
So I guess you looked and looked some more for the best in Bush but just couldn't find anything. tongue.gif
Udmas
Fair enough. I've disliked certain politicians before but not to the point that I see people feeling towards Bush. Maybe I just didn't read as much then as I do now to notice it.
tattoomeb
QUOTE (SMan @ Oct 19 2005, 04:15 PM)
Please tell me how burning dead bodies is torture.  Maybe this is disrespectful but how is it torturing a dead body?????

BTW, torture is tattoomeb's description.  The word "torture" never appears in that article.
*


Sorry I changed the title of the post. It was miss leading I was just in a hurry.
Idiot
QUOTE (BMIC @ Oct 19 2005, 12:33 PM)
BTW, Frontline is well known to be a blatantly liberal propagandizer. They're a bit more high brow than most liberal mouthpieces, but they're far from balanced and objective. They're really just classic PBS =  FLAMING liberal.
*


Translation - They seldom agree with B's dumb-@ss opinions.

wink.gif
Idiot
QUOTE (Idiot @ Oct 20 2005, 08:08 AM)
QUOTE (BMIC @ Oct 19 2005, 12:33 PM)
BTW, Frontline is well known to be a blatantly liberal propagandizer. They're a bit more high brow than most liberal mouthpieces, but they're far from balanced and objective. They're really just classic PBS =  FLAMING liberal.
*


Translation - They seldom agree with B's dumb-@ss opinions.

wink.gif
*



Something's not right, it looks like B's dumb-@ss button is broken.

laugh.gif
Snoopy
Well, Idiot, I see your foray into the literary world has done wonders for your vocabulary and debate skills. rolleyes.gif From hijacking threads to saying another poster's opinions are "dumb-@ass" you're really elevating things here. You represent your side well... huh.gif

Now, for all the anti-torture folks out there... Hypothetical scenerio - the "ticking timebomb" scenerio that has been discussed in political circles. There is a ticking nuke (or similar device that will cost thousands of lives and billions in damage) somewhere on US soil. We get ahold of a terrorist that almost certainly knows where the device is -- knows all the important details. Do you support any type of law that would allow, say, a 3-judge panel, to authorize the torture of this terrorist by experts in the science in an attempt to save lives?
tattoomeb
These kinds of things have got to stop.

QUOTE
Published on Thursday, October 20, 2005 by the Associated Press 
Guantanamo Hunger Strikers Say Feeding Tubes Employed as Torture 

 
SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico - Prisoners on hunger strike at the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, reported troops force-fed them with dirty feeding tubes that have been violently inserted and withdrawn as punishment, said declassified notes released Wednesday by defence lawyers.

The repeated removal and insertion of the tubes has caused striking prisoners to vomit blood and experience intense pain they have equated with torture, the lawyers reported to a U.S. federal judge after visiting their clients at the base in eastern Cuba.

Prisoners said they were taunted by troops who said the treatment was intended to persuade them to end the hunger strike that began Aug. 9, the lawyers wrote in affidavits filed as part of a lawsuit in federal court in Washington seeking greater access to prisoners at the high-security jail for terror suspects.

Lt.-Col. Jeremy Martin, a military spokesman for the Guantanamo detention centre, said all detainees in the hunger strike are closely monitored by medical personnel and mistreatment is not tolerated, though he did not know the specific procedures for handling the feeding tubes.

"Detainees...are treated humanely," Martin said.

"Claims to the contrary are wholly inaccurate and blatantly misrepresent the excellent work being done here by honourable military and civilian professionals."

Guantanamo officials have said this latest hunger strike began with 76 detainees protesting against their confinement. Defence lawyers have cited other reasons as well, including complaints about food and water, alleged abuse by guards and interrogators and their desire to either face trial or be released.

Yousef al Shehri, 21, of Saudi Arabia, told his lawyers guards removed a nasal feeding tube from one prisoner and reinserted it into another without cleaning it first.

"These large tubes...were viewed by the detainees as objects of torture," lawyer Julia Tarver, whose firm represents 10 Saudi detainees, said in an affidavit.

"They were forcibly shoved up the detainees' noses and down into their stomachs."

At Guantanamo Bay, the U.S. military holds about 500 detainees suspected of terrorist activities. Martin said 25 detainees are on hunger strike, including 22 who are being force-fed.

The number participating in the strike reached a high of 131 in mid-September when detainees refused meals to commemorate the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in the United States, Martin said.

Most detainees participating in the hunger strike are not confined to hospital beds and are permitted to exercise, take showers, send and receive mail, visit the detainee library and practise their religion, he said.

Defence lawyers who have visited the prison in recent weeks said their clients have lost substantial weight, appeared listless and depressed - and have insisted they will maintain the protest until conditions improve or they are released. A judge has not yet ruled on their request for increased access to the detainees and their medical records.

Notes of meetings between lawyers and their clients at the detention centr eare classified until they have been reviewed by the military and cleared for release.

Joshua Colangelo-Ryan, a lawyer for six men from Bahrain, said one of his clients, Isa al Murbati, has lost about 50 pounds as a result of the hunger strike.

"There's nothing in my mind that he intends to stop the hunger strike," said Colangelo-Ryan, who returned from Guantanamo on Monday.

Tarver, who returned from the base Oct. 2, said two of her clients were being force-fed and unable to walk.

"It's quite a drastic situation," she said.
Udmas
So now force feeding somebody so they won't die is torture.

Did the 90 senators include that form of torture in their amendment. rolleyes.gif
tattoomeb
QUOTE (Udmas @ Oct 20 2005, 04:40 PM)
So now force feeding somebody so they won't die is torture.

Did the 90 senators include that form of torture in their amendment. rolleyes.gif
*


Did you read the article?


repeated removal and insertion of the tubes has caused striking prisoners to vomit blood and experience intense pain

Yousef al Shehri, 21, of Saudi Arabia, told his lawyers guards removed a nasal feeding tube from one prisoner and reinserted it into another without cleaning it first.

"They were forcibly shoved up the detainees' noses and down into their stomachs."

Sounds like torture to me.
Udmas
Sounds like prisoners lying to me.
SMan
OK, don't force it in. Then we will have Idiot/tattoo starting threads about us starving them to death.
SMan
Ever hear of Godwin's Law, Idiot? According to it, this thread is over. laugh.gif

As for the NAACP snub, I wouldn't be going where I'm not wanted either. The NAACP hasn't been snubbed before because the hatred shown towards Bush hasn't been shown to a president in 45 years. It'd be like Bush trying to speak at the Democratic Convention.
SMan
QUOTE (Idiot @ Oct 20 2005, 07:53 PM)
So he doesn't have to care about anyone who didn't vote for him, huh?

That explains a lot.

wink.gif
*



Didn't you hear? He hates blacks. He bombed one of the New Orleans levees to cause the flood. Ask Farrakhan or Kanye West.

His snub is no different than what any presidential candidate does to a state that has very few electoral votes up for grabs or is a lock to go to the other candidate.
SMan
And lets not forget the diversity of Bush's cabinet. It rivals, and even exceeded that of our "first black president".

How you people can think Bush is a racist is beyond me. You should stick to the topics with real meat on them for bashing Bush.
SMan
He snubbed them for a reason and the reason was not their skin color.

I stand by my snub and I stand by throwing race back at you because you brought it into the mix with your Hitler nonsense, not me.
Idiot
BTW, Maryland just kicked a FG, the score is VT -7, MD - 3.
SMan
Post 40 sums up my feelings.

He didn't owe the NAACP a personal visit because they vehemently opposed him in both elections. Again, why go where you aren't wanted. Just because other presidents did it? Is this your only proof Bush is racist?




Who the heck does Maryland think they are?? I'd like to play some Xbox, but can't as long as the upset is possible.
Snoopy
QUOTE (Idiot @ Oct 20 2005, 09:34 PM)
Hitler made no secret of his dislike of the Jews. Bush has made no secret of his dislike of a whole race of people. He hasn't spoken in front of the NAACP in 5 years in office. No other president in the last 45 years has completed a term in office without addressing this organization which represents a large section of the population.


I think he's a racists based on what I see. He writes off an entire race because "he can win without them", so why should he care about their problems.


Idiot ya better go back to your novel, your political arguments are getting weaker by the day. You give more credance to Clinton speaking to a group who worshipped him, and then doing little else to truly help them, than Bush actually appointing several of them to top posts in his administration and trying to bring many of them up out of continual welfare-style poverty a la New Orleans, where 60 years of Dem rule has made the place a poverty stricken hellhole in many areas. Style over substance. As usual.
BMIC
QUOTE (SMan @ Oct 19 2005, 05:20 PM)
tatoo's link takes me to a story of US soldiers burning the dead bodies of Taliban fighters and broadcasting taunts to a nearby village that harbours Taliban.
*
Well that's not the way to do it! If you want to do it the way they do in the Middle East, you have to cut their heads off and drag their bodies through the streets. Burning them is simply sanitary disposal, to an Arab.
BMIC
QUOTE (Snoopy @ Oct 20 2005, 02:09 PM)
Well, Idiot, I see your foray into the literary world has done wonders for your vocabulary and debate skills.  rolleyes.gif  From hijacking threads to saying another poster's opinions are "dumb-@ass" you're really elevating things here.  You represent your side well... 
*

What are you talking about? He's never been able to formulate a decent, cogent argument supporting his side of an issue. The only thing he's good at is cutting and pasting articles from other web sites. He even seems to have taught that nifty little trick to tattoomeb.
BMIC
BTW, the NAACP does not represent any racial group. They represent a small minority within a racial group.
Udmas
This is an interesting article on CIA Secret Prisons.

QUOTE
The CIA has been hiding and interrogating some of its most important al Qaeda captives at a Soviet-era compound in Eastern Europe, according to U.S. and foreign officials familiar with the arrangement.

The secret facility is part of a covert prison system set up by the CIA nearly four years ago that at various times has included sites in eight countries, including Thailand, Afghanistan and several democracies in Eastern Europe, as well as a small center at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba, according to current and former intelligence officials and diplomats from three continents.

The hidden global internment network is a central element in the CIA's unconventional war on terrorism. It depends on the cooperation of foreign intelligence services, and on keeping even basic information about the system secret from the public, foreign officials and nearly all members of Congress charged with overseeing the CIA's covert actions.


The rest of it is HERE

I wonder what else the CIA is covering up.
Udmas
Bad thing is they can't seem to keep the secrets secret anymore.

I've been hearing alot of this pardon talk lately I hope your just as p!ssed at Clinton for his pardons as your going to be with Bush when he pardons Libby. tongue.gif
Udmas
I would agree the secrets probably were not leaked accidentally. That is a bad thing though too much partisan crap going on now days.

People need to start thinking about the good of the nation instead of how to put the other party down.

I don't think everything the government does has to be public knowledge; we do have senators and representatives to over see things like the CIA.
BMIC
There's a difference between keeping secrets and preserving confidentiality and privacy, that you seem to be missing here, Idiot.

P.S. Back on topic: I think torture should be made legal again, but just for use on those who hire illegal aliens.
Udmas
QUOTE (Idiot @ Nov 3 2005, 07:33 PM)
How do you know the leaker was a Democrat or that they weren't thinking about the good of the nation? Remember "Deep Throat" was a Republican.

Obviously some things shouldn't be public knowledge but where do you draw the line? In the past it's been based on national security but even then congressional committees, Dems and Reps alike, were kept informed. That's why they have security clearances.  It's called checks and balances and it's worked for over 200 years.

Why should the names of CEOs who attended an energy task force meeting and what they discussed be a secret? It's absurd.

You don't need all this secrecy unless you have something to hide. Any Idiot can figure that out.  laugh.gif

Congress is also supposed to over see the White House too but they seem to have forgotten about that part of the job description.

wink.gif
*


Now, Idiot I never said the leaker was a Democrat.

I don't see why the names of the CEOs are a secret.

But I do believe some security items should be secret.
BMIC
Idiiot, you seem to be awfully concerned about everyone's compliance with the law but your own. Knowing you are a criminal scumbag who preferentially hires illegals makes it awfully hard for any of us to take you seriously when you criticize allegedly corrupt politicians.
BMIC
Just keep on laughing, as ICE subpoenas the server logs here and tracks your sorry butt down...
tattoomeb
This quote is from a article I posted in the "More proof they lied" thread a while back the link to the original article is dead now.
QUOTE
But Mr Ingram admitted to the Labour MP Harry Cohen in a private letter obtained by The Independent that he had inadvertently misled Parliament because he had been misinformed by the US. "The US confirmed to my officials that they had not used MK77s in Iraq at any time and this was the basis of my response to you," he told Mr Cohen. "I regret to say that I have since discovered that this is not the case and must now correct the position."

Mr Ingram said 30 MK77 firebombs were used by the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force in the invasion of Iraq between 31 March and 2 April 2003. They were used against military targets "away from civilian targets", he said. This avoids breaching the 1980 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), which permits their use only against military targets.
Looks like an Italian tv station has proof that this took place and will be airing a documentary on Italian tv. With all the torture talk going on right know and Cheney defending the use of it this will be another blow to the Bushco image in the eyes of the world.

QUOTE
Shocking revelation RAI News 24.  Use of chemical weapons by the US military in Iraq. Veteran admits: Bodies melted away before us.

White phosphorous used on the civilian populace: This is how the US "took" Fallujah.

New napalm formula also used.

ROME. In soldier slang they call it Willy Pete. The technical name is white phosphorus. In theory its purpose is to illumine enemy positions in the dark. In practice, it was used as a chemical weapon in the rebel stronghold of Fallujah. And it was used not only against enemy combatants and guerrillas, but again innocent civilians. The Americans are responsible for a massacre using unconventional weapons, the identical charge for which Saddam Hussein stands accused. An investigation by RAI News 24, the all-news Italian satellite television channel, has pulled the veil from one of the most carefully concealed mysteries from the front in the entire US military campaign in Iraq.

A US veteran of the Iraq war told RAI New correspondent Sigfrido Ranucci this: I received the order use caution because we had used white phosphorus on Fallujah. In military slag it is called 'Willy Pete'. Phosphorus burns the human body on contact--it even melts it right down to the bone.

RAI News 24's investigative story, Fallujah, The Concealed Massacre, will be broadcast tomorrow on RAI-3 and will contain not only eye-witness accounts by US military personnel but those from Fallujah residents. A rain of fire descended on the city. People who were exposed to those multicolored substance began to burn. We found people with bizarre wounds-their bodies burned but their clothes intact, relates Mohamad Tareq al-Deraji, a biologist and Fallujah resident.

I gathered accounts of the use of phosphorus and napalm from a few Fallujah refugees whom I met before being kidnapped, says Manifesto reporter Giuliana Sgrena, who was kidnapped in Fallujah last February, in a recorded interview. I wanted to get the story out, but my kidnappers would not permit it.

RAI News 24 will broadcast video and photographs taken in the Iraqi city during and after the November 2004 bombardment which prove that the US military, contrary to statements in a December 9 communiqué from the US Department of State, did not use phosphorus to illuminate enemy positions (which would have been legitimate) but instend dropped white phosphorus indiscriminately and in massive quantities on the city's neighborhoods.

In the investigative story, produced by Maurizio Torrealta, dramatic footage is shown revealing the effects of the bombardment on civilians, women and children, some of whom were surprised in their sleep.

The investigation will also broadcast documentary proof of the use in Iraq of a new napalm formula called MK77. The use of the incendiary substance on civilians is forbidden by a 1980 UN treaty. The use of chemical weapons is forbidden by a treaty which the US signed in 1997

Fallujah. La strage nascosta [Fallujah, The Concealed Massacre] will be shown on RAI News tomorrow November 8th at 07:35 (via HOT BIRDTM statellite, Sky Channel 506 and RAI-3), and rebroadcast by HOT BIRDTM satellite and Sky Channel 506 at 17:00 [5 pm] and over the next two days.
Udmas
QUOTE (Idiot @ Nov 7 2005, 01:35 PM)
Whatever it is why don't they just do it to all those people they've kidnapped from around the world and create some Bush-bots? You'd have a few more votes. You could move them around the country to Florida, or Ohio, or where ever you needed to squeak by. So they say they only have a few hundred  wink.gif  of them. So what? That's a mandate for them.

*


Come on Idiot, I guess you believe the election was fixed.

I didn't think you were that paranoid. biggrin.gif

Is everything Republicans do some sort of conspiracy? wink.gif
Udmas
Jerkin B's chain, doesn't seem to be to hard to do, but sometimes I'm not to sure what your thinking. laugh.gif

Do you really think every body should vote no matter how informed they are?

I would like to see more people vote but only if they are going to at least have some idea of what their voting for.
tattoomeb
Yesterday I posted about an Italian tv station airing a program about the US using MK77 a new form of napalm on civilians in Iraq specifically in Fallujah.

Here is a web page that has the video for viewing or download its a wmv file I believe.

http://www.chris-floyd.com/fallujah/

It downloaded pretty fast for me but it is a large file dial-up beware.
Snoopy
"The technical name is white phosphorus. In theory its purpose is to illumine enemy positions in the dark. In practice, it was used as a chemical weapon in the rebel stronghold of Fallujah. And it was used not only against enemy combatants and guerrillas, but again innocent civilians. The Americans are responsible for a massacre using unconventional weapons, the identical charge for which Saddam Hussein stands accused. "

"But I do believe that Republicans went way overboard in Ohio last year."


rolleyes.gif

I'll tell ya, reading some of the crap you lefties post, ready to believe any charge against the US or Bush -- that's torture. laugh.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.