When somebody who bleeds olive drab as publically as you cant muster the effort to debate whether we've lost the war in Iraq then we'd have to assume its really not debatable. Of course most of America had come to that conclusion before an old Marine colonel found it necessary to stand up and said so in Congress. Noteworthy that the difference between Buckley, ever the loyal conservative, and Murtha, who was castigated as a coward, is that the one exhibits concern mainly for Butch's resultant political dilemma while the other cares deeply for the safety of the troops and the overall welfare of our military.
The NYT offers a somewhat less sanguine
prospectus on Iraq's incipient civil war than Roger Aisles' noisome network:
QUOTE
If Iraq were to sink deeper into that kind of conflict, Baghdad and other cities could become caldrons of ethnic cleansing, bringing revenge violence from one region to another. Shiite populations in Lebanon, Kuwait and especially Saudi Arabia, where Shiites happen to live in the oil-rich eastern sector, could easily revolt. Such a regional conflict could take years to exhaust itself, and could force the redrawing of boundaries that themselves are less than 100 years old.
But hey, when the turmoil in the Middle East pushes oil prices over $100 your Boy Blunder collects kudos for denouncing America's oil addiction in his SOTU.
Here's a prediction for ya...Uncle Dick is gonna walk the plank after the mid-term elections during the holiday news smokescreen. The ostensible excuse announced for his departure will be health issues but the real reason is that he and his neo-fascist faction in the administration have failed his boss and this nation miserably...the recent imbroglio over unwarranted lawyer hunting being the final fatal flaw in Che's resume. The upside for the repugs is that Butch then gets to select an '08 heir apparent (?Jeb!).