QUOTE (Idiot @ Aug 21 2007, 10:13 PM)

QUOTE (Hagerman @ Aug 21 2007, 08:59 PM)

Pardon me for not being here for the last 2.5 years and missing the in depth discussion of this subject.
Can you point me to your comments whcih I am sorry to say I maissed.
Sorry, they were mostly threads I started and now they're gone with the wind except for
the most recent one. But we can start all over. What are your thoughts on the subject?
Surprisingly, I tend to agree with your comments. I think for a start the fines for employers should start at about $10,000.
i don't think it is reasonable to think of a fence along our southern (and northern) boarder.
Something that is not mentioned about illegal workers and those on H1 visas is not only that they are often paid substandard wages but they are often abused because the employer knows that they are not likely to raise a fuss. I work with many people that are on H1's and know for a fact that many are taken advantage of. Maybe not at Microsoft but in a small company they are.
If lettuce workers have to be paid a prevailing wage and the cost of a head of lettuce goes up to $6 then John Deere will develop a harvester. The only reason one does not exist is because it is cheaper to pay someone a substandard wage then to invest in a 200,000 piece of equipment.
Another sticky issue with illegals is the child of an illegal is a US citizen. I don't believe this is right. Only those people that are here and are under the 'control' of the US should be citizens. If diplomat in the states on office business for their country has a child that child is NOT a US citizen because they are not under the 'control' of the US government.
I am not against immigration. My partner for more than 20 years was born in Spain, raised in Mexico and came to the US at age 13. But I don't think that someone that is here illegally deserves to be treated to any of the benefits that coming here legally affords.
To keep this short i think the first and biggest step in a solution is to remove the incentive for sneaking across the boarder by putting the onus on the employers by BIG fines. Identifying the illegal is the biggest problem in this first step. Social Security does advise employers if they receive payments under s SSN that does not match the name on file. How quickly this takes place I can't say. but I know they have several months to resolve the problem. Why SS doesn't inform INS and have them resolve it I don't know.
I also think that this topic will be the biggest issue in the next election.