Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: castro resigns
Herald-Mail Forums > News > World News
theBurninator
QUOTE
Fidel Castro Resigns As Cuba's President
In a file photo Cuban President Fidel Castro gestures during a three-hour sp...


[b]By ANITA SNOW, AP
49 minutes ago // [/b]
HAVANA — An ailing, 81-year-old Fidel Castro resigned as Cuba's president Tuesday after nearly a half-century in power, saying he will not accept a new term when parliament meets Sunday.

The end of Castro's rule — the longest in the world for a head of government — frees his 76-year-old brother Raul to implement reforms he has hinted at since taking over as acting president when Fidel Castro fell ill in July 2006. President Bush said he hopes the resignation signals the beginning of a democratic transition.

"My wishes have always been to discharge my duties to my last breath," Castro wrote in a letter published Tuesday in the online edition of the Communist Party daily Granma. But, he wrote, "it would be a betrayal to my conscience to accept a responsibility requiring more mobility and dedication than I am physically able to offer."

In the pre-dawn hours, most Cubans were unaware of Castro's message. Havana's streets were quiet, and there was no movement at several party-run neighborhood watch groups in Old Havana. It wasn't until 5 a.m., several hours after Castro's message was posted on the internet, that official radio began reading the missive to early risers.

Castro temporarily ceded his powers to his brother on July 31, 2006, when he announced that he had undergone intestinal surgery. Since then, the elder Castro has not been seen in public, appearing only sporadically in official photographs and videotapes and publishing dense essays about mostly international themes as his younger brother has consolidated his rule.

There had been widespread speculation about whether Castro would continue as president when the new National Assembly meets Sunday to pick the country's top leadership. Castro has been Cuba's unchallenged leader since 1959 — monarchs excepted, he was the world's longest ruling head of state.

Castro said Cuban officials had wanted him to remain in power after his surgery.

"It was an uncomfortable situation for me vis-a-vis an adversary that had done everything possible to get rid of me, and I felt reluctant to comply," he said in a reference to the United States.

Castro remains a member of parliament and is likely to be elected to the 31-member Council of State on Sunday, though he will no longer be its president. Raul Castro's wife, Vilma Espin, maintained her council seat until her death last year even though she was too sick to attend meetings for many months.

The resignation opens the path for Raul Castro's succession to the presidency, and the full autonomy he has lacked in leading a caretaker government. The younger Castro has raised expectations among Cubans for modest economic and other reforms, stating last year that the country requires unspecified "structural changes" and acknowledging that government wages that average about $19 (euro13) a month do not satisfy basic needs.

As first vice president of Cuba's Council of State, Raul Castro was his brother's constitutionally designated successor and appears to be a shoo-in for the presidential post when the council meets Sunday. More uncertain is who will be chosen as Raul's new successor, although 56-year-old council Vice President Carlos Lage, who is Cuba's de facto prime minister, is a strong possibility.

Bush, traveling in Rwanda, pledged to "help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty."

"The international community should work with the Cuban people to begin to build institutions that are necessary for democracy," he said. "Eventually, this transition ought to lead to free and fair elections — and I mean free, and I mean fair — not these kind of staged elections that the Castro brothers try to foist off as true democracy."

The United States built a detailed plan in 2005 for American assistance to ensure a democratic transition on the island of 11.2 million people after Castro's death. But Cuban officials have insisted that the island's socialist political and economic systems will outlive Castro.

"The adversary to be defeated is extremely strong," Castro wrote Tuesday. "However, we have been able to keep it at bay for half a century."

Castro rose to power on New Year's Day 1959 and reshaped Cuba into a communist state 90 miles from U.S. shores. The fiery guerrilla leader survived assassination attempts, a CIA-backed invasion and a missile crisis that brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Ten U.S. administrations tried to topple him, most famously in the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961.

His ironclad rule ensured Cuba remained communist long after the breakup of the Soviet Union and the collapse of communism across Eastern Europe.

Castro's supporters admired his ability to provide a high level of health care and education for citizens while remaining fully independent of the United States. His detractors called him a dictator whose totalitarian government systematically denied individual freedoms and civil liberties such as speech, movement and assembly.

The United States was the first country to recognize Castro's government, but the countries soon clashed as Castro seized American property and invited Soviet aid.

On April 16, 1961, Castro declared his revolution to be socialist. A day later, he defeated the CIA-backed Bay of Pigs invasion. The United States squeezed Cuba's economy and the CIA plotted to kill Castro. Hostility reached its peak with the 1962 Cuban missile crisis.

The collapse of the Soviet Union sent Cuba into economic crisis, but the economy recovered in the late 1990s with a tourism boom.



INTERESTING. well, it's about time, but what's next for cuba?? any guesses?? bush sounds like he has a plan or two in mind... rolleyes.gif
Bentcorner
Let’s hope they can use this as an excuse to end the silly embargo. It’s embarrassing at this point. It might be different if we treated every communist country the same. The point is, we don’t. I’d like to be able to go into Sheetz and buy a Cuban cigar. If that makes me wrong, then I don’t want to be right.
Yossarian
You have to look at the sixties to appreciate the reason for the embargo. I don't think we've ever been so close to a direct military attack on the USA as we were during the Cuban Missle Crisis. I don't know whether or not we had the doomsday clock back then, but if we had, I'm sure it was set to one minute (or less) to midnight.

Castro has never been a friend to the USA.

At the very least of importing cuban cigars back into this country, perhaps it will be another resort destination for Americans. Canadians and European people have been vacationing in Cuba for years. Perhaps now the Cuban people can start experiencing prosperity and have a better life for themselves.

But maybe not, as long as Fidel's brother is in power.
theBurninator
do you think Raul will replace fidel?
Yossarian
I think he's pretty much in line for it. And it appears he wants to institute reforms to the government. But Fidel will still remain a leader in the Communist Party.
hagopinion
Bring on the Cuban Cigars, YEA
Bentcorner
QUOTE (Yossarian @ Feb 19 2008, 09:07 AM) *
You have to look at the sixties to appreciate the reason for the embargo. I don't think we've ever been so close to a direct military attack on the USA as we were during the Cuban Missle Crisis. I don't know whether or not we had the doomsday clock back then, but if we had, I'm sure it was set to one minute (or less) to midnight.

Castro has never been a friend to the USA.

At the very least of importing cuban cigars back into this country, perhaps it will be another resort destination for Americans. Canadians and European people have been vacationing in Cuba for years. Perhaps now the Cuban people can start experiencing prosperity and have a better life for themselves.

But maybe not, as long as Fidel's brother is in power.

Yeah, I understand the Cuban Missile crisis, but I think the embargo went into effect before that happened. I know we tried to overthrow Castro before then. I've never understood just why we looked at Soviet missiles in Cuba to be such an overt act of war. We had nuclear missiles in Germany. Heck, we had nukes in South Korea back in the late 80's. I don't know if he still do, but I've often wondered if that played any part in North Korea pursuing nuclear weapon technology. The fact that we introduced nuclear weapons to the Korean peninsula.
Yossarian
We would have had offensive nuclear missiles less than 90 miles from our shore. That's probably a 15 minute delivery time (don't know the exact time.. but I'm sure it's close). Relations between the Soviets and US were at a very dangerous time. I still remember Krushchev standing at the U.N. banging his shoe on the podium and telling us "We will Bury You!"

We issued warnings about the missles to the Soviets. I fully believe had they been delivered to Cuba, a lot of us may not be here today writing in this forum.

Those old newsreels you see with the kids in elementary school learning "duck and Cover".... I remember doing that, hiding under our desks or assembled in the hallways when the practice air raid sirens went off. Of course, I was too young to realize what it all meant, but I did get some idea that things were not safe.

It was all about "Balance of Power", no one country could have more nukes than any other. That way, everyone would be hesitant to push the first button. Regardless of the fact that any one country could have destroyed the world 10 times over.

The Balance of Power would have shifted to the Soviets with missles so close to the US. I guess our nukes in Germany were balanced out by the Soviets nukes elsewhere.
Bentcorner
Yeah, but didn't we have nuclear missiles in Turkey aimed at the Soviet Union before the Cuban missile crisis? I think history shows that both the U.S. and the Soviets both helped escalate tensions. Plus, by 1960, the Soviets already had nuclear ballistic subs that they could use to strike anywhere in the United States. And Khrushchev didn't bang his shoe at the United States and threaten it. I think he was calling someone from the Philippines an idiot. He wasn't at the podium, he was sitting in his seat. I think the bury quote was from a dinner or something. It wasn't from the UN and it wasn't about the missile crisis. Its been a long time since I read up on the Soviets. They wore funny hats.
Yossarian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_will_bury_you



QUOTE
Five months after the U-2 incident, the volatile Khrushchev — on the world’s largest political stage, the UN General Assembly — angrily denounced Lorenzo Sumulong, the leader of the Phillipine delegation, as “a jerk, a stooge, and a lackey of imperialism.”

At that point, Khrushchev furiously banged his shoe on the podium, earning him the nickname “Hurricane Nikita.”

Sumulong had questioned Khrushchev about his stance on western imperialism when the Soviets had, themselves, swallowed all of Eastern Europe.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1906.html
Bentcorner
QUOTE (Yossarian @ Feb 19 2008, 10:41 AM) *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Missile_Crisis

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_will_bury_you



QUOTE
Five months after the U-2 incident, the volatile Khrushchev — on the world’s largest political stage, the UN General Assembly — angrily denounced Lorenzo Sumulong, the leader of the Phillipine delegation, as “a jerk, a stooge, and a lackey of imperialism.”

At that point, Khrushchev furiously banged his shoe on the podium, earning him the nickname “Hurricane Nikita.”

Sumulong had questioned Khrushchev about his stance on western imperialism when the Soviets had, themselves, swallowed all of Eastern Europe.

http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1906.html


OK. I remember he was sitting at his seat, but if Wikipedia says he was at the podium.... He didn't say anything there about burying the United States though, right?

But what did the Philippines have to do with missiles in Cuba? I don't remember that having anything to do with Cuba.

My point is -- I guess -- that I think it's time for the Cuba embargo to come to an end.
SMan
If interested, Netflix 13 Days....it's a freakin' outstanding movie about the Cuban Missile Crisis. It really captured the tension of how close to the brink we were.
Bentcorner
QUOTE (SMan @ Feb 19 2008, 11:16 AM) *
If interested, Netflix 13 Days....it's a freakin' outstanding movie about the Cuban Missile Crisis. It really captured the tension of how close to the brink we were.


Everything I need to know about the Soviets I learned from the movie Red Dawn. biggrin.gif

Wolverines!
Wolverines!
Wolverines!
ChipStewart
I never understood our embargo - always seemed to me that open trade could be quite democratizing. If you wanted upset their authoritarian regime, give them access to American goods! Give 'em TV's, computers, American clothing, Coca Cola, etc. They'll want more. Give 'em access to visit the U.S. so they can see what we have. I think that was at least a piece of the puzzle in the downfall of the U.S.S.R.

That . . . . and I wouldn't mind having a good Cuban Cohiba or a Montecristo once in a while.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.