Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: A Healthier America?
Herald-Mail Forums > Community Corner > Getting a little help from my friends > Health Matters
PandorasBox
Living Longer?

I don't know if this is a good thing or not? The way this world is going, do I even want to imagine what it will be like in 30, 40, 50 years??? unsure.gif

QUOTE
Life Expectancy Reaches New Record
Life Expectancy Pushes Past 78 Years; Death Rate Falls for 11 of 15 Top Causes of Death
By Miranda Hitti
WebMD Health NewsReviewed by Louise Chang, MDJune 11, 2008 -- U.S. life expectancy has hit a new record: 78.1 years for babies born in 2006, says the CDC.

What's more, the death rate for 11 of the top 15 causes of death -- including heart disease, cancer, and stroke -- slowed in 2006.

That's what the CDC's preliminary data show, based on some 2.4 million deaths in 2006. Here are the highlights from the CDC's report.

Life Expectancy
Life expectancy in 2006 is about four months longer than it was in 2005, according to the CDC.

White women continue to have the longest life expectancy, followed by African-American women, white men, and African-American men. Those patterns have held since 1976, though all groups have seen their life expectancy improve during that time.

Here are the 2006 life expectancy figures for each of those groups:

White women: 81 years
African-American women: 76.9 years
White men: 76 years
African-American men: 70 years

Top Causes of Death
Here are the top causes of death for 2006 in the U.S., and the change in their age-adjusted death rate since 2005:

Heart disease: down 5.5%
Cancer: down 1.6%
Stroke: down 6.4%
Chronic lower respiratory diseases (lung diseases): down 6.5%
Accidents: down 1.5%
Alzheimer's disease: down 0.9%
Diabetes: down 5.3%
Influenza and pneumonia: down 12.8% due to a relatively mild flu season
Kidney disease: unchanged
Septicemia (an infection that affects the blood and other parts of the body): down 2.7%
Suicide: down 2.8%
Chronic liver disease and cirrhosis: down 3.3%
High blood pressure: down 5%
Parkinson's disease: down 1.6%
Homicide: down 1.6%
The decreases in the death rate for Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, and homicide may have been due to chance, and the kidney disease death rate held steady, so that leaves the CDC confident that 11 of the 15 leading causes of death had lower death rates in 2006 than in 2005.

The list's order is largely unchanged, except that Alzheimer's disease and diabetes traded places.

The preliminary infant death rate dropped 2.3% from 2005 to 2006, the CDC reports.

Best, Worst State Death Rates
Among states, Hawaii had the lowest age-adjusted death rate and Mississippi had the highest death rate in 2006, according to the CDC.

But if you fold U.S. territories into that ranking, Guam edged out Hawaii, and American Samoa ranked lower than Mississippi.

Here's how the states and territories ranked in their age-adjusted death rates, starting with the lowest rate:

Guam
Hawaii
Virgin Islands
Minnesota
California
New York
Utah
Florida
Connecticut:
Colorado:
Massachusetts
Vermont:
Washington
Arizona
New Hampshire
North Dakota
Puerto Rico
Iowa
Nebraska
New Jersey
South Dakota
Wisconsin
Rhode Island
Idaho
New Mexico
Alaska
Oregon
Maine
Virginia
Illinois
Montana
Delaware
Texas
Maryland
Kansas
Pennsylvania
Michigan
Wyoming
Nevada
Ohio
North Carolina
Indiana
Missouri
Georgia
South Carolina
Arkansas
Washington, D.C.
Tennessee
Kentucky
Oklahoma
Louisiana
West Virginia
Alabama
Mississippi
Northern Mariana Islands
American Samoa
Mcgee
According to the life span of a male. I only have 15 years at tops left. PARTY AT MY HOUSE for the next 15 years. lol

Making a note for my wife. Teds rent- it has back- hoes. laugh.gif laugh.gif
Ithlilian
How can all of the percentages go down for say cancer heart disease etc, doesn't one of them have to go up to make up for all the others going down?

It's like saying 1% less people like xbox this year
2.5% less people like ps3
1.3% less people like wii

That is all of the current system choices, so if they all go down, what went up to make up for it? Where is the other option?

I hope my question made sense.
Udmas
Just think how high it will go when we get national healthcare. rolleyes.gif
Ithlilian
This is really bothering me, I hope someone can answer my question, I'm annoyed that all of these this are going down and nothing is going up.

Also, on an unrelated note. When you put icecubes in water, then the ice cubs melt, the water level stays the same as it was after you put ice cubes in. So what is all this crap I used to hear about melting ice caps causing the water level to rise. THINK about that for a second. That doesn't make a bit of sense. Matter can not be created or destroyed either so there is just as much water here now as there was a billion years ago.
SMan
How are we are the international ranking? If I remember, it wasn't as high as you'd think.
PandorasBox
QUOTE (Ithlilian @ Jun 12 2008, 06:21 PM) *
This is really bothering me, I hope someone can answer my question, I'm annoyed that all of these this are going down and nothing is going up.

Also, on an unrelated note. When you put icecubes in water, then the ice cubs melt, the water level stays the same as it was after you put ice cubes in. So what is all this crap I used to hear about melting ice caps causing the water level to rise. THINK about that for a second. That doesn't make a bit of sense. Matter can not be created or destroyed either so there is just as much water here now as there was a billion years ago.


LIFE SPAN is going up... laugh.gif

J/K wink.gif
SMan
QUOTE (Ithlilian @ Jun 12 2008, 06:21 PM) *
Also, on an unrelated note. When you put icecubes in water, then the ice cubs melt, the water level stays the same as it was after you put ice cubes in. So what is all this crap I used to hear about melting ice caps causing the water level to rise. THINK about that for a second. That doesn't make a bit of sense. Matter can not be created or destroyed either so there is just as much water here now as there was a billion years ago.


Ice that's already floating in our oceans isn't the problem. Floating ice is already accounted for in the sea level. The problem is the thick ice on land in places like Antartica and Greenland. If that land ice starts melting and trickling into the oceans, sea level could possibly rise.

Ice has more mass than water, but is less dense (so it floats). So, when the ice in your glass melts, the level should actually go down.

Of course, I could be full of it and have no idea what I'm talking about. tongue.gif
Checkingin
Yeah, but you sure sound good!! hee hee I believe!
Ithlilian
I never heard them say anything about the ice melting on land. I heard them say that the ice caps are melting. However, I didn't know what the term ice cap referred to obviously. Supposedly ice caps can only form over top of land. (definition of ice cap http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_ice_cap)

So therefore I didn't realize we were talking about greenland and antarctica melting, yes THAT would increase the sea level.
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/...polar-ice_x.htm

I was thinking about ice cubes and water. Glaciers. If all the glaciers melted then that wouldn't raise the sea level at all because they are already floating in it. Don't try to think about the density and all that nonsense, do an experiment.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/end...periments.shtml
SMan
QUOTE (Ithlilian @ Jun 13 2008, 06:57 PM) *
I never heard them say anything about the ice melting on land. I heard them say that the ice caps are melting. However, I didn't know what the term ice cap referred to obviously. Supposedly ice caps can only form over top of land. (definition of ice cap http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_ice_cap)

So therefore I didn't realize we were talking about greenland and antarctica melting, yes THAT would increase the sea level.
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/...polar-ice_x.htm

I was thinking about ice cubes and water. Glaciers. If all the glaciers melted then that wouldn't raise the sea level at all because they are already floating in it. Don't try to think about the density and all that nonsense, do an experiment.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/end...periments.shtml


It's not nonsense, it's simple science. huh.gif
Ithlilian
QUOTE
Ice has more mass than water, but is less dense (so it floats). So, when the ice in your glass melts, the level should actually go down.


Nonsense.

http://www.seed.slb.com/qa2/FAQView.cfm?ID=1166
SMan
Hey, I was half right with the land ice part. Remember though, I did have a disclaimer in my original post. biggrin.gif wink.gif
Idiot
The problem is that in most cases the "floating" ice acts as a dam for the land ice. Didn't y'all watch Al Gore's movie? laugh.gif
Ithlilian
I personally don't care what will happen to the world in 1000 years. Not my problem.

biggrin.gif biggrin.gif
Udmas
That's not a good attitude to have.

Not that I disagree though.

laugh.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.