The General Assembly on Monday night put the final touch on a measure that delays Baltimore's next local election by a year — aligning the city's voting cycle with the presidential schedule and allowing a one-time, five-year term for MayorStephanie Rawlings-Blakeand other city officials.
Supporters said the measure, which moves the next citywide election to November 2016, could boost turnout and save money.
The change will save the city $3.7 million because it won't have to run its own election, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Department of Legislative Services. The state would save about $270,000.
A spokesman for Rawlings-Blake said the move "has the potential of increasing voter turnout, which was our goal."
Gov.Martin O'Malleysaid he was "inclined to sign" the measure, but enthusiasm for it is hardly universal. A voters rights coalition wants the city to be on the gubernatorial election schedule instead, a change it believes would boost turnout even further.
The switch will extend the terms of Rawlings-Blake and the sitting council by one year. That means she and Council President Bernard C. "Jack" Young— who came into their positions after Mayor Sheila Dixon's resignation and served two years before being elected — will hold office for seven years, although they were only elected to a four-year term.
The city's current off-year election schedule has long given Baltimore politicians an advantage over other state elected officials: They were able to hold onto their city seats while seeking state office.
O'Malley benefited from the timing in 2006 when he ran for governor while keeping his title as mayor. More recently,Sen. Catherine Pughwas able to keep her seat in the legislature while waging a mayoral campaign in 2011.
Legislation to move the city's election to the gubernatorial schedule — like the state's 23 counties — was introduced this year by Baltimore Sen. Nathaniel J. McFadden. The bill was complex; it would have set city elections in 2016 and moved them again in 2018.
McFadden, the senior member of the all-Democratic city delegation, said he was outvoted after the mayor and most City Council members lobbied the legislature for the presidential cycle.
"I'm firmly convinced the gubernatorial [cycle] is the best way to go and continue to think so," he said.
McFadden believes that turnout would be higher in gubernatorial years and that city voters should go to the polls at the same time as those in the counties.
"Aligning ourselves with the other subdivisions around the state is critical," he said. "We're in a better posture when we do it that way and everyone's on the ballot at the same time."
Also troubling, he said, is the long period between the primary in presidential years and the general election. McFadden noted that in 2016, Maryland would hold its primary in April, and defeated lame ducks could continue making decisions until being replaced at the end of the year. That is disturbing, he said, in a city where winning the Democratic primary is tantamount to election.
McFadden said he is deferring to the will of the delegation majority. "You win some and you lose some. We definitely have to change that [odd year] municipal election," he said.
Also objecting was Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller, who voted against the bill when it was in his chamber and said the legislation "didn't make sense." He also wanted the city to vote at the same time as other counties.
Rawlings-Blake spokesman Ryan O'Doherty discounted the criticism. "The city has always had a cycle that's not been with the state," he said. "Cities up and down the East Coast also have off-year elections. Cities are different."
When asked about Rawlings-Blake's extended term, O'Doherty said, "That's not a consideration for the mayor. Her consideration was reducing city costs and increasing voter turnout."
The president of a coalition of voters' rights groups said she was disappointed by the General Assembly's decision.